Movie Review : Imagining
Argentina... My
Impressions
Antonio Banderas has a
furrowed brow in the best of the times. In Imagining Argentina, a powerful and
disturbing political drama, his look serves to best append with the role of Carlos,
a passive but tortured head of a children’s theatre company in Buenos Aires in
late 70s, when Argentina was under a repressive military dictatorship. The
leading lady, Emma Thompson, is authoritative as Carlos’ journalist wife,
Cecilia, with tight demeanour, pursed lips and her hard stare.

As is well known,
dear reader, I have no ability whatsoever of reviewing a movie that involves
multiple technologies, abilities and skills. So I will borrow on those aspects from
more knowledgeable reviewers while weaving my appreciation of the art, the
story and style, and what it meant to me.
This is a riveting
film but not of the ” feel good ” kind. It is a labour of love. Imagining Argentina is
about the best and the worst within us, narrated with passion. It does
present suspense, devotion and romance, but also a few probing insights into
human nature that give credit to its maker. Considering how the information and
advertising space is occupied, whether in print or on air and the web, it is
not surprising that the movie has received little publicity. There is no
glamour or sex, or emotional mush to attract the eyeballs here.
I found the
narrative beautiful; it kept me on the edge of my seat. The acting is just
right to convey the story of how more than 30,000 people – families, husbands,
wives, sons and daughters – disappeared during those years between 1976 and
1983, when the dreaded regime was overthrown. The director, Christopher Hampton
adapts the storyline from a prize-winning novel, takes poetic license to weave
the desperate, helpless and unhappy conditions under which an entire population
lived. He imagines… with some realism and a lot of daring.
The rather passive
protoganist, Carlos, suddenly discovers the ability to see everywhere… into all
those places of rape, torture and execution, where people and children snatched
from their homes were illegally held for weeks and months, if not shot. Carlos
could hold the hand of a boy, whose father has disappeared, and divine the
parent’s fate. He sets up a tent of sorts, drawing the multitudes… heartsick
relatives – sad, anxious and weeping – just wanting to know what’s become of
their loved ones. Carlos says it, like he sees it, even when he sees their
death. That is his single means to rebel, defy and oppose the all – powerful
military dictators and their fascist enterprise. It does not make him a
superman but a sure terror to the smug regime, sitting pretty behind the cloak
of secrecy necessary in the defense of ‘ national security.‘

Hampton, an Oscar
winner for his Dangerous
Liaisons screenplay, seems far more skilled with words than
visuals. The conversations between Carlos and Cecilia are smart, allowing
Banderas and Thompson to sparkle. It speaks of a conversation they had had before
they were married, which Cecilia recalls to remind him of a detail he’d
forgotten. She tells him of that situation not long after they had first met, when
she was explaining to him her desire to be a journalist and asking difficult
questions from everybody involved, especially the powers that were answerable
but would not. She says, “You said, ‘Ask me a difficult question.’ ” And, she
reminds him, she had responded, ” ‘Will you marry me ?’.” The effect, of how
she had proposed to him, was magical… to both Carlos, in the movie, and the
audience that included me !
Hampton could have
been more creative in portraying Carlos’ visions, to distinguish them from
scenes in the main that carry the story forward. His imaginings are portrayed
in the same colour and style, not in black and while or grainy, or as an inset
blurb. It make it difficult for the audience to separate that which was in his
visions from the incremental shots sequenced to move the narrative. The doubt
lingers : Is Carlos on the level or is he a charlatan ? Or, is he gone mad with
his personal grief, on account of the loss of his wife and daughter ? On the
other hand, the technique offers to the audience the opportunity to regard
Carlos’ visions as real, as events truly happened then. An opportunity that I
availed.

Carlos can’t see
Cecilia as clearly as the strangers he’s asked about by his visitors. On an
elusive search to rescue her, he journeys to the countryside, hither and
thither, and chances upon an elderly couple, memorably played by Claire Bloom
and John Wood, who have lived through and survived a Nazi concentration camp.
It is from them that he learns how to live with a reality that oppresses,
denies, denudes, enslaves, restricts, tortures, rapes and kills. ” Imagine an
alternate reality… ” the couple suggest, one that will pervade the mind and
suffuse the heart, raise the spirit and strengthen it, in contrast to the
reality in our sight and experience. Thornton’s work does that in Imagining Argentina,
in Carlos’ clairvoyance which becomes a metaphor for rebellion that
wins over the faceless hordes of subhuman spirit.

In another
marvelous conversation, Claire Bloom’s character explains why they keep so many
birds on their estate. Hampton neatly ties this in with an ending that’s fills
the despairing heart with hope. It’s wonderful, to say the least.
Imagining Argentina adds a
postscript listing the number of people who have “disappeared” around the
world, including 90,000 in Iraq. It brings the reality of the subject matter
closer to us. Despite its several flaws that critics point out, the human –
interest film does a fine job of highlighting a major cause of misery that we
serve to ourselves. It helps us imagine what it is like to loose our loved ones
on account of unbridled drive for power that humans have, and its unchecked
misuse that snatch our relatives and friends away from us, from you and I who
are left behind… feeling and living the dark misery over and over again, in
vain.
The movie suggests…
if you are living a pervasive nightmare, there is no alternative but to re –
imagine it ! For the empathy is life – giving and the positive memory is a
powerful personal means, which together become long – reaching political
instruments in themselves.
* * * * * *
Argentina’s Dirty
War and the regime of Generals from 1976 to 1983 is one of the darkest secrets
of history. It has been examined by poets and journalists, by writers such as
Colm Toibin and Lawrence Thornton. And yet the silence about this period is
deafening, especially since the amnesty which released the perpetrators from
all responsibility of that terrible time and their terrifying deeds.
In that context, Imagining
Argentina is an expose… a red flag, high and bravely waving.

In 1976 the intellectuals – professors, journalists
and writers – began disappearing… kidnapped and taken to secret hideaways,
tortured, raped, and disposed off… all in the cause of protecting the viability
of the military regime led by General Videla, which projects the ruse of
communist avalanche it has sworn to battle against and protect the people from.
But fascism and communism are close cousins and, as Argentina’s history of the
period shows, it is easy to trip over to the same fascist position while battling
a supposed brutal scourge.
This episode of
Argentine history should be remembered by mankind everywhere, as a human
interest story pertaining to the evil in our own nature and as a part of the overall
human evolution tale.
A detailed Premium Review of the movie
: Imagining Argentina : is available @ http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0078S99L8.
Premium Reviews are not a pageful of
matter written over a sitting but are compre-hensive treatments running
into scores of pages, penned on days spread over weeks… because
the subject deserves that space and attention and the effort is worth the reviewer’s
while, as it obtains through the exercise.
Premium Review
presentations are inclusive, well researched, and an entire range of aspects
are straddled over to sketch out what the work or creation, band or person
under review could mean to the discerning audience.
Premium Reviews etch in the reasons for the
reader of the review to visit, watch or read, and know for himself more about
the subject reviewed.